Discussion Text

Definition

Discussion is a process of finding common ground between two different thoughts, views or opinions. Discussion text can be defined as a text which presents a problematic discourse. This problem will be discussed from different viewpoints. Discussion is commonly found in philosophical, historic, and social text. In other words, discussion text is a kind oftext used to present (at least) two points of view about an issue.

Generic Structures of Discussion Text

– Issue: stating the issue which is to be discussed
– Argument pro: presenting the points supporting the presented issue
– Argument cons: presenting other points opposing the points supporting the presented issue
– Conclusion / recommendation: stating the writer’ recommendation of the issue

Communicative Purpose of Discussion Text

– To present two points of view about an issue or a problem.
– To present arguments from different points of view about a issue or a problem..

Language Features of Discussion Text

– Introducing category or generic participant
– Using thinking verbs; feel, hope, believe, etc
– Using contrastive conjunctions; however, on the other hand, but, in other side, although, etc
– Using modalities; must, should, could, may, etc
– Using adverbials of manner; deliberately, hopefully, etc
– Using simple present tense

An Example of Discussion Text

Nuclear Energy : Advantage Or Disadvantage

Nuclear energy is commonly offered as an alternative to overcome the crisis of energy. The debate whether the use of nuclear energy is an appropriate choice or not, has not come to an end. Some people agree with the utilization of it because of its benefits. Some others, however, disagree because of its risks to the environment.

Those who agree with the operation of nuclear reactors usually argue that nuclear energy is the only feasible choice to answer the ever – increasing energy needs. In their opinion, the other sources of energy: oil, coal, and liquid natural gas are not renewable and safe, while nuclear energy can be sustainable when produced in a safe way.

However, people who disagree with the use of nuclear energy point out that the waste of nuclear products can completely destroy the environment and human lives. A meltdown in reactor, for example, usually results in the contamination of the surroundings soil and water. Take for example, the blow up of the nuclear reactor at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Station in Russia twenty years ago. The serious contamination imperiled people and the environment severely.

It is obvious that nuclear energy should be avoided because it really endangers the environment but what about a less polluted energy instead of nuclear energy. Is there any alternative energy to overcome the crisis of energy? In my opinion, nuclear energy is the best choice to overcome the crisis of energy. However, government should make sure that nuclear reactor’s construction and maintains are safe.